Skip to main content

Granular Permissions Improvements at Mews: Quick input needed

  • November 3, 2025
  • 10 replies
  • 137 views

rui.oliveira
Mews Employee
Forum|alt.badge.img

Hello,
We’re reaching out for your input as we build the next generation of permissions in Mews.

Our goal is to make it easier for you to control who can do what across your property—reducing the number of admins required, and giving users only the access they truly need.

To make sure we focus on what matters most to you, we’d like to ask a few quick questions about which permissions are most important for your operations.
Your feedback will help us define a minimum viable product (MVP) that solves your biggest pain points faster.
For example, we’re interested to know:

  • Which permissions do you think would make the biggest impact if they were more granular?
  • Where would being able to restrict access help you reduce your admin workload or improve security?

Please, use this link to provide your answers, and we’ll make sure your needs help shape our roadmap.

Thank you for helping us build a better Mews!

10 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Helper
  • 37 replies
  • November 3, 2025

@rui.oliveira , filled in. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have questions! I would love to discuss this further!

Rgds, Kirsten - Amrâth Hôtels.


  • Master Contributor
  • 36 replies
  • November 3, 2025

In my opinion, the best solution for this would be if there was the possibility to request certain permissions for individual use cases by a user in real time and to be able to release them in real time by a supervisor (administrator) present. A kind of "release request" for single cases. These requests are only possible if a corresponding supervisor is on site (logged in). If there is no supervisor on site, you can determine whether the user then generally has the authorization to solve these cases without request or has to wait until a supervisor is on site again.

 

Certainly not easy to implement, but maybe something for the road map.


jeffzarrinnam
  • Senior Contributor
  • 20 replies
  • November 3, 2025

Yes, please feel free to contact me anytime as well to discuss.

Thanks 

Jeff


rui.oliveira
Mews Employee
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • Mews Employee
  • 17 replies
  • November 4, 2025

Hi ​@Kirsten ​@Niclas ​@jeffzarrinnam!

Thanks for your input, and it's really exciting to see you're also excited about this piece of work.

Feel free to share this link with your peers, the more feedback we can collect the more accurate this research's results will be!

 

 


Robin Gustavsson
Senior Guru
Forum|alt.badge.img+2

Hello,

I just completed the form.
The more granular, the better in my opinion - especially when it comes to the “Property” section.


Mark Alexander Joel
Forum|alt.badge.img

I completed the survey! This is a much sought after feature so look forward to the outcome! 


Linus.Bihn
Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Superstar Helper
  • 217 replies
  • November 12, 2025

Done. Feel free to reach out if needed


  • Master Apprentice
  • 5 replies
  • November 13, 2025

In my opinion, the best solution for this would be if there was the possibility to request certain permissions for individual use cases by a user in real time and to be able to release them in real time by a supervisor (administrator) present. A kind of "release request" for single cases. These requests are only possible if a corresponding supervisor is on site (logged in). If there is no supervisor on site, you can determine whether the user then generally has the authorization to solve these cases without request or has to wait until a supervisor is on site again.

 

Certainly not easy to implement, but maybe something for the road map.

I love this idea; it would be incredibly helpful.

Alternatively, I could see implementing a quick sign-in process for the supervisor? Imagine a list or grid of all supervisors, each with their avatar. They would only need to enter their PIN to confirm their identity instead of entering the full password. This way, if the PIN is compromised, they wouldn’t have full access to the accounts and their rights.


  • Master Apprentice
  • 5 replies
  • November 13, 2025

I’m not sure if this is the appropriate topic to discuss, but one way to limit their access to the website and app would be to implement iP whitelisting.
 

This would prevent my new 18-year-old receptionist from downloading the app and answering guest inquiries on a Friday night when he’s out drinking with friends or even worse, booking a room last minute with a significant discount or even free (we are a hotel on a street full of bars), as all receptionists have access to all the rates. For large properties with a large user base, iP whitelisting would be a must to enforce security by a hundredfold.

 

 


Andreas Behl
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Helper
  • 70 replies
  • November 13, 2025

What we are missing in this area as a small hotel group are the following features in the permissions management:

 

Central, cross-property control of permissions from one property — to reduce maintenance effort.
Temporary permissions, for example:
     - for trainees or temporary staff working at events, etc.
     - also necessary when employees leave the company → ability to set an end date for permissions.

 

@Kathi