Skip to main content
Solved

VAT Changes for Breakfast Products in Germany - How Are You Handling It in Mews?

  • November 24, 2025
  • 21 replies
  • 572 views

Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Hello Community,

As there will most likely be a tax change in Germany in 2026, where breakfast food and breakfast beverages will be subject to different VAT rates, and as far as I know, Mews is not currently working on a solution - how do you plan to handle this in Mews for your portfolio?

Our current setup uses a single breakfast product added via product rules. With the VAT update, we will be required to create two separate products. However, updating the existing product rules or creating new ones will affect existing reservations and increase the total price.

 

A possible solution could be my feature request to allow setting start and end dates on product rules. Please consider giving it an upvote if this would help you as well: https://feedback.mews.com/forums/918232-property-operations-pms/suggestions/50046567-start-end-date-functionality-in-product-rules

Best answer by Robin Gustavsson

Hi everyone, I’ve passed on your questions and will get back to you as soon as I receive feedback. Thank you very much for your patience.

Hello,

As time is running fast, I have already had my own discussions with team members at Mews to get a full understanding of what Mews is actually doing in this “fix.” According to Mews, “The script runs periodically to swap the old products for new split component products. The script does not work on product rules. It scans reservations for old products, and if it finds them, whatever their source (product rules or manually added), it replaces them with the components.”
 

My understanding of the above is that product rules are not replaced, nor are the products added through the channel manager integration. As a result, the incorrect products will continue to be added. Mews also informed us that the two new products must have the same price as the one old product. This means that properties will not be able to update their breakfast price for 2026 until the script has been run and has swapped out all old products. The script is, as mentioned, run “periodically,” but I do not know what that means in this context.
 

In conclusion:
Does running a script fix the problem short term? Yes.
Does running the script solve it long term? No.
 

A long term solution would be to create the two new products (ensuring that their total value matches the one old product, both with 19 percent VAT, then using the “Update Tax Item” functionality when the VAT rate actually changes on food products). Instead of relying on a script, existing product rules should be manually updated by setting the action to “Cancel” for the old breakfast product and “Add” for the new products. The product rules should then, with the help of the Mews team, be triggered to update all existing reservations.

The script would then serve only to replace products posted directly on the billing screen, such as an external breakfast, if this is even posted in advance.

When handled this way, once the product rule has been triggered and all existing reservations have been updated correctly, the property can update the breakfast price on the new products however they choose for 2026, without the risk of changing the total price.
 

I have tested my approach at one of our properties. We use product rules extensively, and I had to manually trigger all future reservations one by one. It took me a full day to do this manually, but the end result was what I expected. Triggering the product rules on all reservations took a long time. If Mews would assist by running the job for the product rule update, this would not require much more effort than creating the new products and updating the product rules.
 

A huge time saver would have been my feature request to allow setting start and end dates on product rules with different conditions. Please consider giving it an upvote if this would help you as well: https://feedback.mews.com/forums/918232-property-operations-pms/suggestions/50046567-start-end-date-functionality-in-product-rules

21 Replies

Leif Penning
Trailblazer
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Trailblazer
  • November 25, 2025

Hi Robin,

Inka from Mews wrote the following in the DACH group:


“...There is still no solution regarding breakfast products that will be subject to two different tax rates in the future. Our tech team is already working on finding a way to offer products with different tax rates correctly via the booking systems and to make them easily visible on invoices.

However, we cannot promise that there will be a solution before the changeover. Therefore, you will have to work with two separate products in the meantime.

As soon as there is any news on this, you will be notified. If you have any questions in the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Kind regards,

Inka Nebel” (thanks to deepl.)

So work is being done on it.

We will probably work with an open split for guests until the final result. So both breakfast rates, Food and Bev will be listed separately on the bill. It's not ideal, but...
 

Best regards

Leif


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Hi Robin,

Inka from Mews wrote the following in the DACH group:


“...There is still no solution regarding breakfast products that will be subject to two different tax rates in the future. Our tech team is already working on finding a way to offer products with different tax rates correctly via the booking systems and to make them easily visible on invoices.

However, we cannot promise that there will be a solution before the changeover. Therefore, you will have to work with two separate products in the meantime.

As soon as there is any news on this, you will be notified. If you have any questions in the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Kind regards,

Inka Nebel” (thanks to deepl.)

So work is being done on it.

We will probably work with an open split for guests until the final result. So both breakfast rates, Food and Bev will be listed separately on the bill. It's not ideal, but...
 

Best regards

Leif

Hello Leif,

Thank you for updating me with the information you have from ​@inka.nebel . Let’s really keep our fingers crossed that Mews finds a solution before the new VAT rules take effect.


For us, the main issue is that we sell rooms including breakfast, and the breakfast product has already been posted to hundreds of upcoming reservations. If I edit the product rule by including another product, all future reservations will have this additional product cost added on top of the final price - meaning all future reservations will become more expensive than they should be.

I’ve also found that actions like check-in will trigger the product rule and increase the price.
 

Our absolute last resort would be to manually trigger the updated product rule and then manually reduce the nightly rate by the same amount added by the breakfast beverage product. This would have to be done for all existing reservations that include breakfast. As you can understand, this is simply not feasible.

 


Leif Penning
Trailblazer
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Trailblazer
  • November 25, 2025

Hi Robin,

yes, it's the same for us.
We will most likely change the price of the current breakfast product, add the new breakfast product Bev, and manually adjust reservations on a week-by-week or month-by-month basis, hoping that Mews will offer a solution soon.
Hope springs eternal.

Best regards

Leif


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Hi Robin,

yes, it's the same for us.
We will most likely change the price of the current breakfast product, add the new breakfast product Bev, and manually adjust reservations on a week-by-week or month-by-month basis, hoping that Mews will offer a solution soon.
Hope springs eternal.

Best regards

Leif

Hello,

Yes, we will also update our breakfast prices for 2026; however, the prices for products already posted to reservations will remain unchanged. When the updated product rule is triggered (for example, at check-in), the prices of already-posted products are not updated. Only the product newly added to the product rule will be added on top.

Hopefully, Mews has a solution for this so that we do not have to manually adjust all reservations.


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Hello! 👋

Yesterday, I received an email from Mews with a solution to the issue. ​@Leif Penning  did you receive it as well? If not, feel free to send me a message with your email address, and I will forward it to you. The same goes for anyone else who didn’t receive the email but needs it.


Niclas Lundström

Hey ​@Robin Gustavsson, I´d be interested in this mail, thanks :)

Best regards, Niclas 


Sarah.Masterton-Brown
Mews Employee
Forum|alt.badge.img+2

Thanks ​@Robin Gustavsson 
We are working on sending out email communications to affected customers this week, as well as an article for this community.
We have also just published this help article walking you through the process to prepare for this change:
How to prepare for the 2026 Germany VAT change in Mews Operations

Any further questions that the help article doesn’t answer, the team will be happy to answer.

Thanks


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Thanks ​@Robin Gustavsson 
We are working on sending out email communications to affected customers this week, as well as an article for this community.
We have also just published this help article walking you through the process to prepare for this change:
How to prepare for the 2026 Germany VAT change in Mews Operations

Any further questions that the help article doesn’t answer, the team will be happy to answer.

Thanks

Perfect! 🌟


Niclas Lundström

Hey Sarah, thanks for your reply. In the help article it says we´re supposed to submit a form with the updated product mapping. Why are we doing this? :)

Best regards, Niclas


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

@Sarah.Masterton-Brown , 

A question regarding the section marked in yellow: If the price of the two new products must be equal to the price of the old product, what is the difference between submitting the mappings to Mews and updating our product rules ourselves with CANCEL: Breakfast 2025 and ADD: Breakfast Food 2026 & Breakfast Beverage 2026?
 

This is another scenario where my feature request for specifying the start and end dates of a product rule would be extremely valuable, as it would allow us to perform the update today rather than having to wait until the actual start date.
 

 


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

@Sarah.Masterton-Brown , 

A question regarding the section marked in yellow: If the price of the two new products must be equal to the price of the old product, what is the difference between submitting the mappings to Mews and updating our product rules ourselves with CANCEL: Breakfast 2025 and ADD: Breakfast Food 2026 & Breakfast Beverage 2026?
 

………...

Might the difference be that Mews can trigger this instantly, whereas our product rules are only triggered and updated when the reservation is checked in? I know that changing the price of a product does not update the price for products already posted. This means that if I update the product rule and trigger it upon check-in, the price will be updated if it has changed, whereas Mews’ update of the product rule will keep the product prices intact.

Am I correct in my assumption?


jessica.becker
Mews Employee
Forum|alt.badge.img+1

Hi everyone, I’ve passed on your questions and will get back to you as soon as I receive feedback. Thank you very much for your patience.


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Hi everyone, I’ve passed on your questions and will get back to you as soon as I receive feedback. Thank you very much for your patience.

Hello,

As time is running fast, I have already had my own discussions with team members at Mews to get a full understanding of what Mews is actually doing in this “fix.” According to Mews, “The script runs periodically to swap the old products for new split component products. The script does not work on product rules. It scans reservations for old products, and if it finds them, whatever their source (product rules or manually added), it replaces them with the components.”
 

My understanding of the above is that product rules are not replaced, nor are the products added through the channel manager integration. As a result, the incorrect products will continue to be added. Mews also informed us that the two new products must have the same price as the one old product. This means that properties will not be able to update their breakfast price for 2026 until the script has been run and has swapped out all old products. The script is, as mentioned, run “periodically,” but I do not know what that means in this context.
 

In conclusion:
Does running a script fix the problem short term? Yes.
Does running the script solve it long term? No.
 

A long term solution would be to create the two new products (ensuring that their total value matches the one old product, both with 19 percent VAT, then using the “Update Tax Item” functionality when the VAT rate actually changes on food products). Instead of relying on a script, existing product rules should be manually updated by setting the action to “Cancel” for the old breakfast product and “Add” for the new products. The product rules should then, with the help of the Mews team, be triggered to update all existing reservations.

The script would then serve only to replace products posted directly on the billing screen, such as an external breakfast, if this is even posted in advance.

When handled this way, once the product rule has been triggered and all existing reservations have been updated correctly, the property can update the breakfast price on the new products however they choose for 2026, without the risk of changing the total price.
 

I have tested my approach at one of our properties. We use product rules extensively, and I had to manually trigger all future reservations one by one. It took me a full day to do this manually, but the end result was what I expected. Triggering the product rules on all reservations took a long time. If Mews would assist by running the job for the product rule update, this would not require much more effort than creating the new products and updating the product rules.
 

A huge time saver would have been my feature request to allow setting start and end dates on product rules with different conditions. Please consider giving it an upvote if this would help you as well: https://feedback.mews.com/forums/918232-property-operations-pms/suggestions/50046567-start-end-date-functionality-in-product-rules


jessica.becker
Mews Employee
Forum|alt.badge.img+1

Hey Sarah, thanks for your reply. In the help article it says we´re supposed to submit a form with the updated product mapping. Why are we doing this? :)

A question regarding the section marked in yellow: If the price of the two new products must be equal to the price of the old product, what is the difference between submitting the mappings to Mews and updating our product rules ourselves with CANCEL: Breakfast 2025 and ADD: Breakfast Food 2026 & Breakfast Beverage 2026?

Hi ​@Niclas Lundström  & ​@Robin Gustavsson this is the answer to your questions I have received from the team: 
The obvious recommended solution is that customers create 2 split component products and sell them. However, it may be unhandy (or outright impossible in some systems) to have travellers “select and add” 2 products when all they want to add is a breakfast buffet. In such a scenario, we have the ability to “accept” a reservation with a single “bundled-product” (like breakfast) and then replace it (after being processed) by its components. This way travellers are not bogged down by needing to select multiple products, when all they want is a single breakfast. This use case is exacerbated in add-on products, not packaged products, since product rules can be changed to add the components directly (as is recommended).

 

Might the difference be that Mews can trigger this instantly, whereas our product rules are only triggered and updated when the reservation is checked in? I know that changing the price of a product does not update the price for products already posted. This means that if I update the product rule and trigger it upon check-in, the price will be updated if it has changed, whereas Mews’ update of the product rule will keep the product prices intact.

Am I correct in my assumption?

@Robin Gustavsson see below response from the team:
Good question! Product rules only deal with scenarios where the breakfast is packaged with the rate. However, they do not support upselling (for instance through the Kiosk or emails). Here, it is non-optimal to force the guest to select multiple component products. For these scenarios, we can use the mappings that the hotel submits to automatically replace the bundle with its consituents.

 

I hope this helps clear things up a bit. If you have any further questions, please let me know!


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Hello ​@jessica.becker 👋

Thank you for getting back to me.

I now understand that this is a kind of quick fix by Mews to achieve “bundle products.”
Seeing it like that makes sense, as your own booking engine needs some type of support for that.

However, we already sell breakfast on our rates as packaged items. In Mews this is done via a product rule, and in our CRS we create them as packages. Because of this, the solution is not fully applicable to us, and we are facing different issues.
 

I am a bit puzzled by the explanation below that I received from Mews by email. It states that the script does not deal with reservations that have already been made. For us, those are exactly the reservations that are causing issues, not how we sell breakfast online.
 

"The only issue here is that our script does not deal with reservations that have already been made; it deals with new incoming reservations. We do not re-run or even run any product rules. All we do is scan the reservation for products that need to be swapped out (as submitted in the XLS form). We find those products, cancel them, and swap them out for their components (as in the XLS form)."
 

With that being said, the only thing I can see the script doing for us is updating already posted upsell breakfast products with the correct split. Apart from that, the approach I mentioned earlier is the only way for us to ensure the correct setup and have our existing reservations updated accordingly.


coline.poussiere
Mews Employee
Forum|alt.badge.img+1

Thank you for getting back to me.

I now understand that this is a kind of quick fix by Mews to achieve “bundle products.”
Seeing it like that makes sense, as your own booking engine needs some type of support for that.

However, we already sell breakfast on our rates as packaged items. In Mews this is done via a product rule, and in our CRS we create them as packages. Because of this, the solution is not fully applicable to us, and we are facing different issues.
 

I am a bit puzzled by the explanation below that I received from Mews by email. It states that the script does not deal with reservations that have already been made. For us, those are exactly the reservations that are causing issues, not how we sell breakfast online.
 

"The only issue here is that our script does not deal with reservations that have already been made; it deals with new incoming reservations. We do not re-run or even run any product rules. All we do is scan the reservation for products that need to be swapped out (as submitted in the XLS form). We find those products, cancel them, and swap them out for their components (as in the XLS form)."
 

With that being said, the only thing I can see the script doing for us is updating already posted upsell breakfast products with the correct split. Apart from that, the approach I mentioned earlier is the only way for us to ensure the correct setup and have our existing reservations updated accordingly.

Hi ​@Robin Gustavsson 

Thank you for your reply

I haven’t been able to track the email you speak off to understand the full context but, indeed, the job works differently and both systems run the risk of missing some reservations depending on your set up.

As per our article (How to prepare for the 2026 Germany VAT change in Mews Operations), we do indeed recommend that you set up already for your packaged products the 2 new products but with current (2025) VAT and ask us to update all your existing reservations. but as you pointed out there are limitations regarding upsell and manually added products.

 

If, as you said, your property(ies) are mainly using packaged products and your biggest concern is the already existing reservations, we do believe that the cleanest method is the product rule and mapping in your Distribution channel one , and indeed the fix job might have a lesser impact, though we would still recommend you also complete it. Then on January 1st, most (if not all) of your reservation will already have the 2 new products and you will be able to update the VAT as required at that time.

 

Regarding what you mentioned of needing to trigger each reservation one by one

  • Support can run a job to help with that, which we do ask that you request as early as possible as we need to manually trigger said job (Step 5 about contacting Mews Support is for that exact purpose)
  • What that job does is “resaving” the reservation which triggers newer product rule. If the job was not run before the reservation arrival, the check in should have the exact same effect on the reservations.

Hope the above helps

Kind regards


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Hi ​@Robin Gustavsson 

Thank you for your reply

I haven’t been able to track the email you speak off to understand the full context but, indeed, the job works differently and both systems run the risk of missing some reservations depending on your set up.

As per our article (How to prepare for the 2026 Germany VAT change in Mews Operations), we do indeed recommend that you set up already for your packaged products the 2 new products but with current (2025) VAT and ask us to update all your existing reservations. but as you pointed out there are limitations regarding upsell and manually added products.

 

If, as you said, your property(ies) are mainly using packaged products and your biggest concern is the already existing reservations, we do believe that the cleanest method is the product rule and mapping in your Distribution channel one , and indeed the fix job might have a lesser impact, though we would still recommend you also complete it. Then on January 1st, most (if not all) of your reservation will already have the 2 new products and you will be able to update the VAT as required at that time.

 

Regarding what you mentioned of needing to trigger each reservation one by one

  • Support can run a job to help with that, which we do ask that you request as early as possible as we need to manually trigger said job (Step 5 about contacting Mews Support is for that exact purpose)
  • What that job does is “resaving” the reservation which triggers newer product rule. If the job was not run before the reservation arrival, the check in should have the exact same effect on the reservations.

Hope the above helps

Kind regards

Hello! 👋

The emails were between myself, our CSM, and some other Mews team members, so you won’t find them as a standard support ticket.

“Support can run a job to help with that, which we do ask that you request as early as possible as we need to manually trigger said job (Step 5 about contacting Mews Support is for that exact purpose).”
Yes, that’s great! I’ve already been assisted with running the job for some of our properties. I’m still working on the rest, and I’ll be assisted with those as soon as I’m ready.

“What that job does is ‘resaving’ the reservation, which triggers the newer product rule. If the job was not run before the reservation arrival, the check-in should have the exact same effect on the reservations.”
I know - that’s what I was doing manually at one of my properties to see how long it would take in case Mews was unable to run the job in time. 😀

Having check-in as a trigger is both good and bad. Again, I see a lot of value in having start and end dates on product rules, as well as more granular conditions to apply products only if certain criteria are met, such as “Start date from: XXXX” or “Reservation stay period: XXXX to XXXX.”

 


  • Wanderer
  • December 10, 2025

Hello, I can´t find the micrsoft formular to send the new products to the MEWS Team, can you provide this again?


jessica.becker
Mews Employee
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Mews Employee
  • December 10, 2025

Hi ​@TorstenR you can find the form here


Robin Gustavsson
Mentor
Forum|alt.badge.img+4

Hello, I can´t find the micrsoft formular to send the new products to the MEWS Team, can you provide this again?

https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=wjfbr_ETeEq5HoV0msjoB-WEDoxYPphEgcumkSZitfZUN1dRVk8zSDZTRFo1OUFaNVhNRTM2RTI5Qi4u&route=shorturl


coline.poussiere
Mews Employee
Forum|alt.badge.img+1

Hello! 👋
 

“What that job does is ‘resaving’ the reservation, which triggers the newer product rule. If the job was not run before the reservation arrival, the check-in should have the exact same effect on the reservations.”
I know - that’s what I was doing manually at one of my properties to see how long it would take in case Mews was unable to run the job in time. 😀

Having check-in as a trigger is both good and bad. Again, I see a lot of value in having start and end dates on product rules, as well as more granular conditions to apply products only if certain criteria are met, such as “Start date from: XXXX” or “Reservation stay period: XXXX to XXXX.”

 

Hi Robin, 

We also think that would be a great feature. Much like the product bundling you mentioned earlier, this is one of the future developments being considered, but we have to provide guidance with the current limitations of the system.